♥ u

February 14, 2011

damien hirst, love you (detail), 1994-5

ken lum, untitled (cushionpainting), 1990

marcel duchamp, fountain, 1917

sherrie levine, fountain (after marcel duchamp), 1991

edgar degas, young spartans exercising, 1860

attila richard lukacs, the young spartans challenge the boys to fight, 1988


Bojangles Cafe on Denman St will soon be just one more Starbucks Coffee shop

Here in the West End of Vancouver, BC, another blow has been struck against local cultural diversity.  The Bojangles Cafe at the intersection of Robson and Denman Streets will be closing at the end of the month.  The (not so quiet) rumour is that the coffee giant and cultural icon (read: steamroller) Starbucks will be appropriating the space for one of their many (many, many, etc., etc.) retail shops.

Announced with a small, typed sign in the front window, Bojangles Cafe stated that it would be closing due to “failure to renew its lease”.  This quote implies that Bojangles Cafe itself is at fault for its impending closure, which is likely an incomplete, if not misleading, statement.

To get a more inclusive picture of the situation, we must examine the factors behind the Cafe’s failure to renew its lease.  Firstly, real estate in the West End is (to put it mildly) pricey, and the demand for retail space in such a high traffic area as Robson Street is enormous.  This means that building owners can, and do, maintain and enforce inflated rental costs.

The second and more unnerving factor is Starbucks’ aggressive retail expansion campaign.  Knowing the lease was coming up on the space Bojangles currently occupies, the American corporate giant likely made an offer to the building owner that the local company could not hope to compete with.

Hence, Bojangles’ “failure to renew its lease” is more aptly Starbucks’ (continued) success at strong-arming its way into the urban and cultural geography, by way of extinguishing local and independent spirit.  Of course, this is just the capitalist, free-market paradigm at work, which we embrace wholeheartedly in this great democracy of ours.

after … (???)

March 11, 2008

this VIDEO HAIKU was constructed by myself, incorporating appropriated images, sound, and text.

the subject of appropriation has come up in some of my previous blog postings.  is appropriation ethical? is art supposed to be ethical? appropriation has a long and contentious history in art making and the art world. my VIDEO HAIKU speaks to identity and self discovery — but also, through my use of appropriation, brings into question how personal identity is constructed? it also raises concerns around originality and authenticity in the realms of art, the artist, and the individual.

the artists represented in my VIDEO HAIKU are Attila Richard Lukacs (images), Animal Collective (sound), and Kijo Murakami (text).

on IDEAS, pt. 2

February 27, 2008